Kari Ellen Gade (ed.) 2017, ‘Anonymous Lausavísur, Stanzas from Snorra Edda 1’ in Kari Ellen Gade and Edith Marold (eds), Poetry from Treatises on Poetics. Skaldic Poetry of the Scandinavian Middle Ages 3. Turnhout: Brepols, p. 512.
(not checked:)
báðir (pron.; °gen. beggja (báðra), nom./acc. n. bǽði): both
[1] Bæði: so W, U, B, ‘Teþi’ R, ‘bedi‑’ Tˣ
(not checked:)
2. eiga (verb; °á/eigr (præs. pl. 3. pers. eigu/eiga); átti, áttu; átt): own, have
[1] ák (‘a ek’): ‘‑a’ Tˣ, er U
(not checked:)
til (prep.): to
(not checked:)
brúðr (noun f.; °brúðar, dat. & acc. brúði; brúðir): woman, bride
[1] brúðar: ‘broþr’ U
[1-2, 3] sollinn vind brúðar bergjarls ‘my swollen wind of the wife of the mountain-jarl [GIANT > GIANTESS > THOUGHT]’: According to Skm (SnE 1998, I, 108), ‘thought, mind’ ought to be circumscribed as ‘wind of the giantess’: Huginn skal svá kenna at kalla vind trǫllkvinna ok rétt at nefna til hverja er vill ok svá at nefna jǫtnana eða kenna þá til konu eða móður eða dóttur þess ‘Thought shall be paraphrased in such a manner as to call it wind of troll-women, and it is correct to name whichever [troll-woman] one wants and also to name giants and qualify her [the troll-woman] as the wife or mother or daughter of that one’. The origin of this type of kenning is obscure. Kock (NN §1098; Skald) argues that, rather than til lit. ‘to’ (l. 1) being an adv., it is more natural to take it as a prep. with the object brúðar ‘wife, woman’ (at senda til brúðar ‘to send to the woman’). While that is certainly correct (we would not expect the adv. til in an unstressed position and a syntactic break before position 5), it forces Kock to construe the kenning as sollinn vind bergjarls ‘swollen wind of the mountain-jarl [GIANT > THOUGHT]’, in which the determinant is ‘giant’ rather than ‘giantess’. There is very little evidence, if any, for such a kenning (see Meissner 138-9), and the present edn therefore follows SnE 1848-87, Skj B and SnE 1998, II, 243, 263.
(not checked:)
brúðr (noun f.; °brúðar, dat. & acc. brúði; brúðir): woman, bride
[1] brúðar: ‘broþr’ U
[1-2, 3] sollinn vind brúðar bergjarls ‘my swollen wind of the wife of the mountain-jarl [GIANT > GIANTESS > THOUGHT]’: According to Skm (SnE 1998, I, 108), ‘thought, mind’ ought to be circumscribed as ‘wind of the giantess’: Huginn skal svá kenna at kalla vind trǫllkvinna ok rétt at nefna til hverja er vill ok svá at nefna jǫtnana eða kenna þá til konu eða móður eða dóttur þess ‘Thought shall be paraphrased in such a manner as to call it wind of troll-women, and it is correct to name whichever [troll-woman] one wants and also to name giants and qualify her [the troll-woman] as the wife or mother or daughter of that one’. The origin of this type of kenning is obscure. Kock (NN §1098; Skald) argues that, rather than til lit. ‘to’ (l. 1) being an adv., it is more natural to take it as a prep. with the object brúðar ‘wife, woman’ (at senda til brúðar ‘to send to the woman’). While that is certainly correct (we would not expect the adv. til in an unstressed position and a syntactic break before position 5), it forces Kock to construe the kenning as sollinn vind bergjarls ‘swollen wind of the mountain-jarl [GIANT > THOUGHT]’, in which the determinant is ‘giant’ rather than ‘giantess’. There is very little evidence, if any, for such a kenning (see Meissner 138-9), and the present edn therefore follows SnE 1848-87, Skj B and SnE 1998, II, 243, 263.
(not checked:)
berg (noun n.; °-s; -): rock, cliff < bergjarl (noun m.)
[1-2, 3] sollinn vind brúðar bergjarls ‘my swollen wind of the wife of the mountain-jarl [GIANT > GIANTESS > THOUGHT]’: According to Skm (SnE 1998, I, 108), ‘thought, mind’ ought to be circumscribed as ‘wind of the giantess’: Huginn skal svá kenna at kalla vind trǫllkvinna ok rétt at nefna til hverja er vill ok svá at nefna jǫtnana eða kenna þá til konu eða móður eða dóttur þess ‘Thought shall be paraphrased in such a manner as to call it wind of troll-women, and it is correct to name whichever [troll-woman] one wants and also to name giants and qualify her [the troll-woman] as the wife or mother or daughter of that one’. The origin of this type of kenning is obscure. Kock (NN §1098; Skald) argues that, rather than til lit. ‘to’ (l. 1) being an adv., it is more natural to take it as a prep. with the object brúðar ‘wife, woman’ (at senda til brúðar ‘to send to the woman’). While that is certainly correct (we would not expect the adv. til in an unstressed position and a syntactic break before position 5), it forces Kock to construe the kenning as sollinn vind bergjarls ‘swollen wind of the mountain-jarl [GIANT > THOUGHT]’, in which the determinant is ‘giant’ rather than ‘giantess’. There is very little evidence, if any, for such a kenning (see Meissner 138-9), and the present edn therefore follows SnE 1848-87, Skj B and SnE 1998, II, 243, 263.
(not checked:)
berg (noun n.; °-s; -): rock, cliff < bergjarl (noun m.)
[1-2, 3] sollinn vind brúðar bergjarls ‘my swollen wind of the wife of the mountain-jarl [GIANT > GIANTESS > THOUGHT]’: According to Skm (SnE 1998, I, 108), ‘thought, mind’ ought to be circumscribed as ‘wind of the giantess’: Huginn skal svá kenna at kalla vind trǫllkvinna ok rétt at nefna til hverja er vill ok svá at nefna jǫtnana eða kenna þá til konu eða móður eða dóttur þess ‘Thought shall be paraphrased in such a manner as to call it wind of troll-women, and it is correct to name whichever [troll-woman] one wants and also to name giants and qualify her [the troll-woman] as the wife or mother or daughter of that one’. The origin of this type of kenning is obscure. Kock (NN §1098; Skald) argues that, rather than til lit. ‘to’ (l. 1) being an adv., it is more natural to take it as a prep. with the object brúðar ‘wife, woman’ (at senda til brúðar ‘to send to the woman’). While that is certainly correct (we would not expect the adv. til in an unstressed position and a syntactic break before position 5), it forces Kock to construe the kenning as sollinn vind bergjarls ‘swollen wind of the mountain-jarl [GIANT > THOUGHT]’, in which the determinant is ‘giant’ rather than ‘giantess’. There is very little evidence, if any, for such a kenning (see Meissner 138-9), and the present edn therefore follows SnE 1848-87, Skj B and SnE 1998, II, 243, 263.
(not checked:)
berg (noun n.; °-s; -): rock, cliff < bergjarl (noun m.)
[1-2, 3] sollinn vind brúðar bergjarls ‘my swollen wind of the wife of the mountain-jarl [GIANT > GIANTESS > THOUGHT]’: According to Skm (SnE 1998, I, 108), ‘thought, mind’ ought to be circumscribed as ‘wind of the giantess’: Huginn skal svá kenna at kalla vind trǫllkvinna ok rétt at nefna til hverja er vill ok svá at nefna jǫtnana eða kenna þá til konu eða móður eða dóttur þess ‘Thought shall be paraphrased in such a manner as to call it wind of troll-women, and it is correct to name whichever [troll-woman] one wants and also to name giants and qualify her [the troll-woman] as the wife or mother or daughter of that one’. The origin of this type of kenning is obscure. Kock (NN §1098; Skald) argues that, rather than til lit. ‘to’ (l. 1) being an adv., it is more natural to take it as a prep. with the object brúðar ‘wife, woman’ (at senda til brúðar ‘to send to the woman’). While that is certainly correct (we would not expect the adv. til in an unstressed position and a syntactic break before position 5), it forces Kock to construe the kenning as sollinn vind bergjarls ‘swollen wind of the mountain-jarl [GIANT > THOUGHT]’, in which the determinant is ‘giant’ rather than ‘giantess’. There is very little evidence, if any, for such a kenning (see Meissner 138-9), and the present edn therefore follows SnE 1848-87, Skj B and SnE 1998, II, 243, 263.
(not checked:)
jarl (noun m.; °-s, dat. -i; -ar): poet, earl < bergjarl (noun m.)
[2] ‑jarls: ‑hjarls B
[1-2, 3] sollinn vind brúðar bergjarls ‘my swollen wind of the wife of the mountain-jarl [GIANT > GIANTESS > THOUGHT]’: According to Skm (SnE 1998, I, 108), ‘thought, mind’ ought to be circumscribed as ‘wind of the giantess’: Huginn skal svá kenna at kalla vind trǫllkvinna ok rétt at nefna til hverja er vill ok svá at nefna jǫtnana eða kenna þá til konu eða móður eða dóttur þess ‘Thought shall be paraphrased in such a manner as to call it wind of troll-women, and it is correct to name whichever [troll-woman] one wants and also to name giants and qualify her [the troll-woman] as the wife or mother or daughter of that one’. The origin of this type of kenning is obscure. Kock (NN §1098; Skald) argues that, rather than til lit. ‘to’ (l. 1) being an adv., it is more natural to take it as a prep. with the object brúðar ‘wife, woman’ (at senda til brúðar ‘to send to the woman’). While that is certainly correct (we would not expect the adv. til in an unstressed position and a syntactic break before position 5), it forces Kock to construe the kenning as sollinn vind bergjarls ‘swollen wind of the mountain-jarl [GIANT > THOUGHT]’, in which the determinant is ‘giant’ rather than ‘giantess’. There is very little evidence, if any, for such a kenning (see Meissner 138-9), and the present edn therefore follows SnE 1848-87, Skj B and SnE 1998, II, 243, 263.
(not checked:)
jarl (noun m.; °-s, dat. -i; -ar): poet, earl < bergjarl (noun m.)
[2] ‑jarls: ‑hjarls B
[1-2, 3] sollinn vind brúðar bergjarls ‘my swollen wind of the wife of the mountain-jarl [GIANT > GIANTESS > THOUGHT]’: According to Skm (SnE 1998, I, 108), ‘thought, mind’ ought to be circumscribed as ‘wind of the giantess’: Huginn skal svá kenna at kalla vind trǫllkvinna ok rétt at nefna til hverja er vill ok svá at nefna jǫtnana eða kenna þá til konu eða móður eða dóttur þess ‘Thought shall be paraphrased in such a manner as to call it wind of troll-women, and it is correct to name whichever [troll-woman] one wants and also to name giants and qualify her [the troll-woman] as the wife or mother or daughter of that one’. The origin of this type of kenning is obscure. Kock (NN §1098; Skald) argues that, rather than til lit. ‘to’ (l. 1) being an adv., it is more natural to take it as a prep. with the object brúðar ‘wife, woman’ (at senda til brúðar ‘to send to the woman’). While that is certainly correct (we would not expect the adv. til in an unstressed position and a syntactic break before position 5), it forces Kock to construe the kenning as sollinn vind bergjarls ‘swollen wind of the mountain-jarl [GIANT > THOUGHT]’, in which the determinant is ‘giant’ rather than ‘giantess’. There is very little evidence, if any, for such a kenning (see Meissner 138-9), and the present edn therefore follows SnE 1848-87, Skj B and SnE 1998, II, 243, 263.
(not checked:)
jarl (noun m.; °-s, dat. -i; -ar): poet, earl < bergjarl (noun m.)
[2] ‑jarls: ‑hjarls B
[1-2, 3] sollinn vind brúðar bergjarls ‘my swollen wind of the wife of the mountain-jarl [GIANT > GIANTESS > THOUGHT]’: According to Skm (SnE 1998, I, 108), ‘thought, mind’ ought to be circumscribed as ‘wind of the giantess’: Huginn skal svá kenna at kalla vind trǫllkvinna ok rétt at nefna til hverja er vill ok svá at nefna jǫtnana eða kenna þá til konu eða móður eða dóttur þess ‘Thought shall be paraphrased in such a manner as to call it wind of troll-women, and it is correct to name whichever [troll-woman] one wants and also to name giants and qualify her [the troll-woman] as the wife or mother or daughter of that one’. The origin of this type of kenning is obscure. Kock (NN §1098; Skald) argues that, rather than til lit. ‘to’ (l. 1) being an adv., it is more natural to take it as a prep. with the object brúðar ‘wife, woman’ (at senda til brúðar ‘to send to the woman’). While that is certainly correct (we would not expect the adv. til in an unstressed position and a syntactic break before position 5), it forces Kock to construe the kenning as sollinn vind bergjarls ‘swollen wind of the mountain-jarl [GIANT > THOUGHT]’, in which the determinant is ‘giant’ rather than ‘giantess’. There is very little evidence, if any, for such a kenning (see Meissner 138-9), and the present edn therefore follows SnE 1848-87, Skj B and SnE 1998, II, 243, 263.
(not checked:)
3. ok (conj.): and, but; also
(not checked:)
skip (noun n.; °-s; -): ship
(not checked:)
dvergr (noun m.; °-s; -ar): dwarf
[1-2, 3] sollinn vind brúðar bergjarls ‘my swollen wind of the wife of the mountain-jarl [GIANT > GIANTESS > THOUGHT]’: According to Skm (SnE 1998, I, 108), ‘thought, mind’ ought to be circumscribed as ‘wind of the giantess’: Huginn skal svá kenna at kalla vind trǫllkvinna ok rétt at nefna til hverja er vill ok svá at nefna jǫtnana eða kenna þá til konu eða móður eða dóttur þess ‘Thought shall be paraphrased in such a manner as to call it wind of troll-women, and it is correct to name whichever [troll-woman] one wants and also to name giants and qualify her [the troll-woman] as the wife or mother or daughter of that one’. The origin of this type of kenning is obscure. Kock (NN §1098; Skald) argues that, rather than til lit. ‘to’ (l. 1) being an adv., it is more natural to take it as a prep. with the object brúðar ‘wife, woman’ (at senda til brúðar ‘to send to the woman’). While that is certainly correct (we would not expect the adv. til in an unstressed position and a syntactic break before position 5), it forces Kock to construe the kenning as sollinn vind bergjarls ‘swollen wind of the mountain-jarl [GIANT > THOUGHT]’, in which the determinant is ‘giant’ rather than ‘giantess’. There is very little evidence, if any, for such a kenning (see Meissner 138-9), and the present edn therefore follows SnE 1848-87, Skj B and SnE 1998, II, 243, 263. — [3] sollinn ‘swollen’: The p. p. of the strong verb svella ‘swell, increase’. Qualifying the base-word in the kenning for ‘thought’, it probably refers to the skald’s frame of mind, agitated by anger, love or pain.
[1-2, 3] sollinn vind brúðar bergjarls ‘my swollen wind of the wife of the mountain-jarl [GIANT > GIANTESS > THOUGHT]’: According to Skm (SnE 1998, I, 108), ‘thought, mind’ ought to be circumscribed as ‘wind of the giantess’: Huginn skal svá kenna at kalla vind trǫllkvinna ok rétt at nefna til hverja er vill ok svá at nefna jǫtnana eða kenna þá til konu eða móður eða dóttur þess ‘Thought shall be paraphrased in such a manner as to call it wind of troll-women, and it is correct to name whichever [troll-woman] one wants and also to name giants and qualify her [the troll-woman] as the wife or mother or daughter of that one’. The origin of this type of kenning is obscure. Kock (NN §1098; Skald) argues that, rather than til lit. ‘to’ (l. 1) being an adv., it is more natural to take it as a prep. with the object brúðar ‘wife, woman’ (at senda til brúðar ‘to send to the woman’). While that is certainly correct (we would not expect the adv. til in an unstressed position and a syntactic break before position 5), it forces Kock to construe the kenning as sollinn vind bergjarls ‘swollen wind of the mountain-jarl [GIANT > THOUGHT]’, in which the determinant is ‘giant’ rather than ‘giantess’. There is very little evidence, if any, for such a kenning (see Meissner 138-9), and the present edn therefore follows SnE 1848-87, Skj B and SnE 1998, II, 243, 263. — [3] sollinn ‘swollen’: The p. p. of the strong verb svella ‘swell, increase’. Qualifying the base-word in the kenning for ‘thought’, it probably refers to the skald’s frame of mind, agitated by anger, love or pain.
(not checked:)
1. vindr (noun m.; °-s/-ar; -ar): wind
[1-2, 3] sollinn vind brúðar bergjarls ‘my swollen wind of the wife of the mountain-jarl [GIANT > GIANTESS > THOUGHT]’: According to Skm (SnE 1998, I, 108), ‘thought, mind’ ought to be circumscribed as ‘wind of the giantess’: Huginn skal svá kenna at kalla vind trǫllkvinna ok rétt at nefna til hverja er vill ok svá at nefna jǫtnana eða kenna þá til konu eða móður eða dóttur þess ‘Thought shall be paraphrased in such a manner as to call it wind of troll-women, and it is correct to name whichever [troll-woman] one wants and also to name giants and qualify her [the troll-woman] as the wife or mother or daughter of that one’. The origin of this type of kenning is obscure. Kock (NN §1098; Skald) argues that, rather than til lit. ‘to’ (l. 1) being an adv., it is more natural to take it as a prep. with the object brúðar ‘wife, woman’ (at senda til brúðar ‘to send to the woman’). While that is certainly correct (we would not expect the adv. til in an unstressed position and a syntactic break before position 5), it forces Kock to construe the kenning as sollinn vind bergjarls ‘swollen wind of the mountain-jarl [GIANT > THOUGHT]’, in which the determinant is ‘giant’ rather than ‘giantess’. There is very little evidence, if any, for such a kenning (see Meissner 138-9), and the present edn therefore follows SnE 1848-87, Skj B and SnE 1998, II, 243, 263.
(not checked:)
5. at (nota): to (with infinitive)
(not checked:)
senda (verb): send
(not checked:)
seinfyrðr (adj.): [never-forgotten]
[4] seinfyrnð ‘the never-forgotten’: Lit. ‘slowly grown old’. A hap. leg. from seinn ‘slow, late’ and *fyrna ‘grow old, age’ (cf. fyrnask ‘grow old, age, be forgotten’; see ShÞ Frag l. 1).
(not checked:)
gata (noun f.): path, road
[4] eina gǫtu ‘in the same direction’: Lit. ‘on one road’, an acc. of place.
(not checked:)
2. einn (pron.; °decl. cf. einn num.): one, alone
[4] eina gǫtu ‘in the same direction’: Lit. ‘on one road’, an acc. of place.
Interactive view: tap on words in the text for notes and glosses
The helmingr is cited as an illustration of kennings for ‘poetry’ of the type skip dverga ‘ship(s) of dwarfs’.
Use the buttons at the top of the page to navigate between stanzas in a poem.
The text and translation are given here, with buttons to toggle whether the text is shown in the verse order or prose word order. Clicking on indiviudal words gives dictionary links, variant readings, kennings and notes, where relevant.
This is the text of the edition in a similar format to how the edition appears in the printed volumes.
This view is also used for chapters and other text segments. Not all the headings shown are relevant to such sections.