Cookies on our website

We use cookies on this website, mainly to provide a secure browsing experience but also to collect statistics on how the website is used. You can find out more about the cookies we set, the information we store and how we use it on the cookies page.

Continue

skaldic

Skaldic Poetry of the Scandinavian Middle Ages

Menu Search

Án Lv 1VIII (Án 1)

Beatrice La Farge (ed.) 2017, ‘Áns saga bogsveigis 1 (Án bogsveigir, Lausavísur 1)’ in Margaret Clunies Ross (ed.), Poetry in fornaldarsögur. Skaldic Poetry of the Scandinavian Middle Ages 8. Turnhout: Brepols, p. 4.

Án bogsveigirLausavísur
12

Skeldi ‘dashed’

(not checked:)
3. skella (verb)

Close

sem ‘as’

(not checked:)
sem (conj.): as, which

notes

[1] sem skyldi ‘as he should’: In most previous eds the verb skyldi ‘should’ is emended to skyldit ‘should not’, presumably because it is thought that the stanza should indicate that Án is stronger than Bjǫrn and thus that Bjǫrn should not have overcome Án in the first round of the wrestling match. However, the prose exchange between Án and King Ingjaldr after the first round of the match suggests otherwise (FSGJ 2, 375): Konungr mælti þá:Eigi þykkir mér þú, Án, jafnsterkr sem þú lézt.Án mælti:Sá þykki mér, konungr, sterkari, er fyrri fellr’ ‘Then the king said: “It doesn’t seem to me as if you were as strong as you said, Án.” Án said: “The one who falls first seems to me the stronger of the two, king”’.

Close

skyldi ‘he should’

(not checked:)
skulu (verb): shall, should, must

notes

[1] sem skyldi ‘as he should’: In most previous eds the verb skyldi ‘should’ is emended to skyldit ‘should not’, presumably because it is thought that the stanza should indicate that Án is stronger than Bjǫrn and thus that Bjǫrn should not have overcome Án in the first round of the wrestling match. However, the prose exchange between Án and King Ingjaldr after the first round of the match suggests otherwise (FSGJ 2, 375): Konungr mælti þá:Eigi þykkir mér þú, Án, jafnsterkr sem þú lézt.Án mælti:Sá þykki mér, konungr, sterkari, er fyrri fellr’ ‘Then the king said: “It doesn’t seem to me as if you were as strong as you said, Án.” Án said: “The one who falls first seems to me the stronger of the two, king”’.

Close

skelkinn ‘fond of mockery’

(not checked:)
1. skelkinn (adj./verb p.p.)

notes

[2] skelkinn ‘fond of mockery’: This word is interpreted by Finnur Jónsson (Skj B) as meaning spottelysten ‘given to mockery, malicious’ (cf. the verb skelkja ‘mock’ and the noun skelkr ‘mockery’). LP: 2. skelkinn, 2. skelkja, 2. skelkr suggests that both the adj. skelkinn and the verb skelkja are related to the noun skálkr ‘servant, rogue’. There are homonyms to most of these words: LP: 1. skelkinn ‘fearful’, 1. skelkja ‘frighten’, 1. skelkr ‘fright, fear’. Both skelkinn ‘fearful’ and skelkinn ‘given to mockery’ apparently occur only once each (LP: 1.-2. skelkinn); the sense ‘mocking’ makes better sense in this stanza than the sense ‘fearful’.

Close

maðr ‘The man’

(not checked:)
maðr (noun m.): man, person

[2] maðr: niðr 109a Iˣ

Close

við ‘against’

(not checked:)
2. við (prep.): with, against

Close

við ‘’

(not checked:)
2. við (prep.): with, against

Close

máttak ‘I was able’

(not checked:)
mega (verb): may, might

Close

þá ‘then’

(not checked:)
2. þá (adv.): then

[3] þá: þótt 109a Iˣ

Close

vinna ‘to put up’

(not checked:)
2. vinna (verb): perform, work

Close

svei ‘fie upon’

(not checked:)
svei

[4] svei: snar 109a Iˣ

notes

[4, 8] svei þeim manni æ ‘fie upon that man forever’: This curse occurs like a refrain in the same form at the end of each helmingr. Finnur Jónsson (Skj B) and Guðni Jónsson (FSGJ) both omit the adv. æ ‘forever’ in l. 4 but retain it in l. 8, presumably because the adv. produces a seven-syllable line in l. 4. Kock proceeds on the assumption that the curse in l. 4 is repeated in identical form in l. 8 (NN §§1482, 2611); however, he regards the reading þæim æ as a way of writing þæima or þema, a variant of the m. sg. dat. form þessom of the demonstrative pron. sjá ‘this’ (NN §2611; ANG §470).

Close

þeim ‘that’

(not checked:)
1. sá (pron.; °gen. þess, dat. þeim, acc. þann; f. sú, gen. þeirrar, acc. þá; n. þat, dat. því; pl. m. þeir, f. þǽ---): that (one), those

notes

[4, 8] svei þeim manni æ ‘fie upon that man forever’: This curse occurs like a refrain in the same form at the end of each helmingr. Finnur Jónsson (Skj B) and Guðni Jónsson (FSGJ) both omit the adv. æ ‘forever’ in l. 4 but retain it in l. 8, presumably because the adv. produces a seven-syllable line in l. 4. Kock proceeds on the assumption that the curse in l. 4 is repeated in identical form in l. 8 (NN §§1482, 2611); however, he regards the reading þæim æ as a way of writing þæima or þema, a variant of the m. sg. dat. form þessom of the demonstrative pron. sjá ‘this’ (NN §2611; ANG §470).

Close

æ ‘forever’

(not checked:)
2. æ (adv.): always, forever

[4] æ: á 109a Iˣ

notes

[4, 8] svei þeim manni æ ‘fie upon that man forever’: This curse occurs like a refrain in the same form at the end of each helmingr. Finnur Jónsson (Skj B) and Guðni Jónsson (FSGJ) both omit the adv. æ ‘forever’ in l. 4 but retain it in l. 8, presumably because the adv. produces a seven-syllable line in l. 4. Kock proceeds on the assumption that the curse in l. 4 is repeated in identical form in l. 8 (NN §§1482, 2611); however, he regards the reading þæim æ as a way of writing þæima or þema, a variant of the m. sg. dat. form þessom of the demonstrative pron. sjá ‘this’ (NN §2611; ANG §470).

Close

manni ‘man’

(not checked:)
maðr (noun m.): man, person

notes

[4, 8] svei þeim manni æ ‘fie upon that man forever’: This curse occurs like a refrain in the same form at the end of each helmingr. Finnur Jónsson (Skj B) and Guðni Jónsson (FSGJ) both omit the adv. æ ‘forever’ in l. 4 but retain it in l. 8, presumably because the adv. produces a seven-syllable line in l. 4. Kock proceeds on the assumption that the curse in l. 4 is repeated in identical form in l. 8 (NN §§1482, 2611); however, he regards the reading þæim æ as a way of writing þæima or þema, a variant of the m. sg. dat. form þessom of the demonstrative pron. sjá ‘this’ (NN §2611; ANG §470).

Close

Varð ‘It was’

(not checked:)
1. verða (verb): become, be

Close

í ‘’

(not checked:)
í (prep.): in, into

notes

[5] at fallaz í fang ‘to grapple with each other’: These words can be translated lit. as ‘to let oneself fall into a [wrestling] grip’. They refer to grappling with one’s opponent in the wrestling match, not, as Kock thinks (NN §1483), to Björn’s fall (death) during the wrestling match. The construction verða at + inf. means ‘must, be forced, obliged to (do sth.)’. Since there is no explicit subject in this sentence it is unclear whether the pret. indic. verb varð is the 1st pers. sg. or the 3rd pers. sg. In the first case the speaker, Án, would be the putative subject. In the second case the putative subject could be ‘he’ (= Bjǫrn), and this is the interpretation favoured by Finnur Jónsson (Skj B) and Kock (Skald; NN §1483). The 3rd pers. sg. could however also be understood as a general statement about the situation, from the perspective of Án: ‘one was obliged to let oneself fall into a grip’ or ‘it was necessary to let oneself fall into a grip’. If varð at is understood in this latter, non-personal sense, the phrase fallaz í fang could also be interpreted in a reciprocal sense (m. v.): ‘fall into each other’s grip’, i.e. ‘grapple, wrestle with each other’: thus ‘it was necessary to grapple with each other’.

Close

fang ‘with each other’

(not checked:)
fang (noun n.; °-s; *-): grasp, tunic

notes

[5] at fallaz í fang ‘to grapple with each other’: These words can be translated lit. as ‘to let oneself fall into a [wrestling] grip’. They refer to grappling with one’s opponent in the wrestling match, not, as Kock thinks (NN §1483), to Björn’s fall (death) during the wrestling match. The construction verða at + inf. means ‘must, be forced, obliged to (do sth.)’. Since there is no explicit subject in this sentence it is unclear whether the pret. indic. verb varð is the 1st pers. sg. or the 3rd pers. sg. In the first case the speaker, Án, would be the putative subject. In the second case the putative subject could be ‘he’ (= Bjǫrn), and this is the interpretation favoured by Finnur Jónsson (Skj B) and Kock (Skald; NN §1483). The 3rd pers. sg. could however also be understood as a general statement about the situation, from the perspective of Án: ‘one was obliged to let oneself fall into a grip’ or ‘it was necessary to let oneself fall into a grip’. If varð at is understood in this latter, non-personal sense, the phrase fallaz í fang could also be interpreted in a reciprocal sense (m. v.): ‘fall into each other’s grip’, i.e. ‘grapple, wrestle with each other’: thus ‘it was necessary to grapple with each other’.

Close

at ‘necessary’

(not checked:)
5. at (nota): to (with infinitive)

notes

[5] at fallaz í fang ‘to grapple with each other’: These words can be translated lit. as ‘to let oneself fall into a [wrestling] grip’. They refer to grappling with one’s opponent in the wrestling match, not, as Kock thinks (NN §1483), to Björn’s fall (death) during the wrestling match. The construction verða at + inf. means ‘must, be forced, obliged to (do sth.)’. Since there is no explicit subject in this sentence it is unclear whether the pret. indic. verb varð is the 1st pers. sg. or the 3rd pers. sg. In the first case the speaker, Án, would be the putative subject. In the second case the putative subject could be ‘he’ (= Bjǫrn), and this is the interpretation favoured by Finnur Jónsson (Skj B) and Kock (Skald; NN §1483). The 3rd pers. sg. could however also be understood as a general statement about the situation, from the perspective of Án: ‘one was obliged to let oneself fall into a grip’ or ‘it was necessary to let oneself fall into a grip’. If varð at is understood in this latter, non-personal sense, the phrase fallaz í fang could also be interpreted in a reciprocal sense (m. v.): ‘fall into each other’s grip’, i.e. ‘grapple, wrestle with each other’: thus ‘it was necessary to grapple with each other’.

Close

fallaz ‘to grapple’

(not checked:)
falla (verb): fall

notes

[5] at fallaz í fang ‘to grapple with each other’: These words can be translated lit. as ‘to let oneself fall into a [wrestling] grip’. They refer to grappling with one’s opponent in the wrestling match, not, as Kock thinks (NN §1483), to Björn’s fall (death) during the wrestling match. The construction verða at + inf. means ‘must, be forced, obliged to (do sth.)’. Since there is no explicit subject in this sentence it is unclear whether the pret. indic. verb varð is the 1st pers. sg. or the 3rd pers. sg. In the first case the speaker, Án, would be the putative subject. In the second case the putative subject could be ‘he’ (= Bjǫrn), and this is the interpretation favoured by Finnur Jónsson (Skj B) and Kock (Skald; NN §1483). The 3rd pers. sg. could however also be understood as a general statement about the situation, from the perspective of Án: ‘one was obliged to let oneself fall into a grip’ or ‘it was necessary to let oneself fall into a grip’. If varð at is understood in this latter, non-personal sense, the phrase fallaz í fang could also be interpreted in a reciprocal sense (m. v.): ‘fall into each other’s grip’, i.e. ‘grapple, wrestle with each other’: thus ‘it was necessary to grapple with each other’.

Close

feldum ‘we [I] felled’

(not checked:)
3. fella (verb): fell, kill

notes

[6] feldum eldsmat nökkut ‘we [I] felled fire-nourishment [FIRE-WOOD] in some way’: The n. sg. nökkut is used adverbially here. Depending upon how the 1st pers. pl. verb form felldum is interpreted, the line either refers to the fact that each man threw his opponent into the fire, or, if Án is speaking of himself in the 1st pers. pl., which seems more likely from the prose context, to the fact that Án caused Björn to be burned by pitching him into the fire. The kenning eldsmatr ‘fire-nourishment’ refers to Björn and metaphorically equates him with fire-wood.

Close

elds ‘fire’

(not checked:)
eldr (noun m.; °-s, dat. -i/-(HómÍsl¹‰(1993) 24v²⁴); -ar): fire < eldsmatr (noun m.): °(food for a fire ɔ:) fuel; (I) (of a person who by evil-doing adds fuel to the eternal fire (of hell))

kennings

eldsmat
‘fire-nourishment ’
   = FIRE-WOOD

fire-nourishment → FIRE-WOOD

notes

[6] feldum eldsmat nökkut ‘we [I] felled fire-nourishment [FIRE-WOOD] in some way’: The n. sg. nökkut is used adverbially here. Depending upon how the 1st pers. pl. verb form felldum is interpreted, the line either refers to the fact that each man threw his opponent into the fire, or, if Án is speaking of himself in the 1st pers. pl., which seems more likely from the prose context, to the fact that Án caused Björn to be burned by pitching him into the fire. The kenning eldsmatr ‘fire-nourishment’ refers to Björn and metaphorically equates him with fire-wood.

Close

mat ‘nourishment’

(not checked:)
matr (noun m.; °-ar, dat. -i/-; -ir): food < eldsmatr (noun m.): °(food for a fire ɔ:) fuel; (I) (of a person who by evil-doing adds fuel to the eternal fire (of hell))

[6] ‑mat nökkut: sinns at mikit 109a Iˣ

kennings

eldsmat
‘fire-nourishment ’
   = FIRE-WOOD

fire-nourishment → FIRE-WOOD

notes

[6] feldum eldsmat nökkut ‘we [I] felled fire-nourishment [FIRE-WOOD] in some way’: The n. sg. nökkut is used adverbially here. Depending upon how the 1st pers. pl. verb form felldum is interpreted, the line either refers to the fact that each man threw his opponent into the fire, or, if Án is speaking of himself in the 1st pers. pl., which seems more likely from the prose context, to the fact that Án caused Björn to be burned by pitching him into the fire. The kenning eldsmatr ‘fire-nourishment’ refers to Björn and metaphorically equates him with fire-wood.

Close

nökkut ‘some way’

(not checked:)
nøkkurr (pron.): some, a certain

[6] ‑mat nökkut: sinns at mikit 109a Iˣ

notes

[6] feldum eldsmat nökkut ‘we [I] felled fire-nourishment [FIRE-WOOD] in some way’: The n. sg. nökkut is used adverbially here. Depending upon how the 1st pers. pl. verb form felldum is interpreted, the line either refers to the fact that each man threw his opponent into the fire, or, if Án is speaking of himself in the 1st pers. pl., which seems more likely from the prose context, to the fact that Án caused Björn to be burned by pitching him into the fire. The kenning eldsmatr ‘fire-nourishment’ refers to Björn and metaphorically equates him with fire-wood.

Close

synjaðak ‘I deprived’

(not checked:)
1. synja (verb): refuse

Close

svei ‘fie upon’

(not checked:)
svei

[8] svei þeim æ manni: sneri þeim at manni 109a Iˣ

Close

æ ‘forever’

(not checked:)
2. æ (adv.): always, forever

[8] svei þeim æ manni: sneri þeim at manni 109a Iˣ

Close

manni ‘man’

(not checked:)
maðr (noun m.): man, person

[8] svei þeim æ manni: sneri þeim at manni 109a Iˣ

Close

Interactive view: tap on words in the text for notes and glosses

Án speaks this stanza after a wrestling match with a man named Bjǫrn inn sterki ‘the Strong’, a retainer of King Ingjaldr who has made fun of Án. In the first round Bjǫrn lifts Án up and casts him to the ground so that his shoulders land in the fire and his feet strike the beam in the wall (bálkr). Since Án is wearing a long loden coat he suffers no burns. In the second round Án swings Bjǫrn to and fro as if Bjǫrn were a small child and then slings him into the fire where he suffers severe burns.

The metre of this stanza is an irregular variant of dróttkvætt. Finnur Jónsson and Kock regard the inf. vinna as the first word of the final half-line in the first helmingr, so that there is a full stop before the sentence svei þeim æ manni (Skj B, Skald; on their alterations of the wording cf. the Note to ll. 4, 8 below). They thus regard the words við máttak þá vætki | vinna; svei þeim æ manni as a long-line with alliteration on <v>; this division of ll. 3-4 has a basis in most of the mss. The sentence svei þeim æ manni occurs again at the end of the second helmingr, where it is preceded by the sentence honum synjaðak heiðri ‘I deprived him of honour’. In that sentence the words honum and heiðri seem to alliterate, with emphatic alliteration on the pers. pron. honum: ‘him I deprived of honour’. In this case the words honum … manni could not be a long-line with alliteration on <s>: honum synjaðak heiðri; | svei þeim æ manni. Previous eds (Finnur Jónsson, Kock) have emended the text by supplying or suggesting various words beginning with <h> at the beginning of the final half-line, so that the final long-line of the stanza would read: honum synjaðak heiðri | heldr; svei þeim æ manni ‘I rather deprived him of honour … ’ (Skj B); honum synjaðak heiðri | hála; svei þeim æ manni ‘I guilefully deprived him of honour … ’ (Skald); honum synjaðak heiðri | harðla; svei þeim æ manni ‘I very much deprived him of honour … ’ (NN §2611). On Kock’s further emendation of the final half-line of the stanza cf. the Note to ll. 4, 8. If the text is not emended in the ways Finnur Jónsson or Kock suggest, one could regard the two sentences við máttak þá vætki vinna; | svei þeim æ manni at the end of the first helmingr and the two sentences honum synjaðak heiðri; | svei þeim æ manni at the end of the second helmingr as two full-lines respectively, albeit the final line of each helmingr (svei þeim æ manni) contains no words which alliterate. Finnur Jónsson and Kock present the stanza as one in fornyrðislag or málaháttr, but the pre-requisite for this is their addition of a word beginning with <h> before the words svei þeim æ manni at the end of the stanza (see above). The present edn follows the ms. tradition in presenting the first helmingr as four half-lines with six metrical positions (l. 4 has seven), with the inf. vinna as the first word of l. 4. Given the probable double alliteration on <h> in l. 7 honum synjaðak heiðri, the refrain in l. 8 has no alliteration and only five metrical positions.

Close

Log in

This service is only available to members of the relevant projects, and to purchasers of the skaldic volumes published by Brepols.
This service uses cookies. By logging in you agree to the use of cookies on your browser.

Close

Stanza/chapter/text segment

Use the buttons at the top of the page to navigate between stanzas in a poem.

Information tab

Interactive tab

The text and translation are given here, with buttons to toggle whether the text is shown in the verse order or prose word order. Clicking on indiviudal words gives dictionary links, variant readings, kennings and notes, where relevant.

Full text tab

This is the text of the edition in a similar format to how the edition appears in the printed volumes.

Chapter/text segment

This view is also used for chapters and other text segments. Not all the headings shown are relevant to such sections.