Cookies on our website

We use cookies on this website, mainly to provide a secure browsing experience but also to collect statistics on how the website is used. You can find out more about the cookies we set, the information we store and how we use it on the cookies page.

Continue

Kenning Lexicon

Kenning Lexicon

Menu Search
1. Skaldic Project Editors' Manual 12. Analysing and formatting kennings 1. Kenning and kenning referent types 4. Base-word

4. Base-word

This is not currently part of the peer-reviewed material of the project. Do not cite as a research publication.

All the above examples of extended kennings have sub-kennings which function as the determinant of the kenning. This allows for the simple modification of the hierarchical structure into the series of referents as shown in §1-3. However, in some cases it is the base-word of a kenning that is a sub-kenning, so the formatting of referents as shown in §1-3 is not appropriate. Instead, the referent of the base-word sub-kenning should be placed next to the sub-kenning:

a. {{hund {hrynsæva hræva}} {ǫl-Gefnar}} — (Þjóð Haustl 11)
b. {{the dog {of the roaring seas of corpses}} [BLOOD > WOLF] {of the ale-Gefn <= Freyja>} [= Iðunn]} [= Þjazi]
c. the dog of the roaring seas of corpses [BLOOD > WOLF] of the ale-Gefn <= Freyja> [= Iðunn] [= Þjazi]

The last two referents, Iðunn and Þjazi, are not within the same brackets. This is to indicate that the referent of the base-word sub-kenning (‘wolf’) is required to understand how ‘Þjazi’ derives from the determinant ‘Iðunn’. This type of kenning tends to be the subject of much debate. See §1-6 for another example.

References

Close

Log in

This service is only available to members of the relevant projects, and to purchasers of the skaldic volumes published by Brepols.
This service uses cookies. By logging in you agree to the use of cookies on your browser.

Close