Ok Ellu bak,
at, lét, hinns sat,
Ok Ívarr, hinns sat at Jórvík, lét bak Ellu skorit ara.
And Ívarr, who resided at York, had Ælla’s back cut with an eagle.
 ara ‘with an eagle’: So also Skj B, taking ara to be dat. sg. here, and bak acc. sg., hence ‘had Ælla’s back cut with an eagle’. Frank (1984a) also assumes ara to be dat., though with instr. meaning, ‘by an eagle’. Kock (NN §3224) on the other hand argues that ara is acc., that bak is an endingless dat. form (cf. ANG §358.3), hence ‘had an eagle cut on Ælla’s back’, and that the prep. at qualifies bak rather than Jórvík, thus producing less disjointed syntax.
This view shows information about an instance of a word in a text.