Né ættstuðill ættar
ógnherði mun verða
— skyldr emk hróðri at halda —
Hilditanns in mildri.
Né mun verða ættstuðill ættar Hilditanns in mildri ógnherði; emk skyldr at halda hróðri.
There will not be a lineage-pillar of the family of Hilditann (‘War-tooth’) [DANISH KING] more generous than the terror-enhancer [WARRIOR]; I am bound to uphold praise.
[2, 4] in mildri ógnherði ‘more generous than the terror-enhancer [WARRIOR]’: The word ógn ‘terror’ is frequently used as a heiti for ‘battle’; the cpd thus characterises the king as successful in war. In the construction in mildri ógnherði, the word in is a colourless adjunct of the comparative (probably originally ‘yet’ in meaning) common in verse (LP: enn 4), and the use of the dat. for ógnherði ‘terror-enhancer’ is the older method of expressing the comparand in comparative constructions. The reading inn mildi ógnherðir ‘the generous terror-enhancer’ of R, W is a plausible noun phrase (and adopted in SnE 1848-87), but it would have to be the subject of the verb of the main clause, with the resulting meaning that the generous warrior is not (or will not be) a pillar of the family. This is not the sort of sentiment normally expressed in panegyric.
Pronouns and determiners: Definite article
The definite article is normally suffixed to nouns, except in some cases where it is used with an adjective. If the noun form ends in a vowel, the 'i' in the article is dropped. If the noun form ends in 'um', the 'm' and 'i' are both dropped. E.g. hesta (acc. pl.) > hestana (acc. pl. definite); hestum (dat. pl.) > hestunum (dat. pl. definite)
masc. | fem. | neut. | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
sing. | N A G D | inn inn ins inum | in ina innar inni | it it ins inu |
pl. | N A G D | inir ina inna inum | inar inar inna inum | in in inna inum |