Sigoa Lv 1^VIII (Ragn 19)

Þat ‘that is what’

(not checked:)
1. sá (pron.; °gen. þess, dat. þeim, acc. þann; f. sú, gen. þeirrar, acc. þá; n. þat, dat. því; pl. m. þeir, f. þǽ---): that (one), those

notes

[1, 2, 4] leiðangr skal verða búinn …, ef þat tregar þik ‘an expedition will be prepared …, if that is what is causing you grief’: The present reading ef þat tregar þik follows Hb 1892-6, Skj B, and Ragn 1906-8, 208 (cf. also Ragn 1944 and 2003), as far as assumed prose order and essential meaning are concerned. Kock (NN §§2369, 2811) objects to this reading on the twofold grounds that it is unacceptable for a subordinate clause to enclose a main clause, and for the conj. introducing the subordinate clause (here ef) to follow the main clause. He emends þat to þá, taking þá ‘then’ as introducing the main clause correlatively with ef (‘if you are worried, then an expedition … will be prepared’). Neither of his objections applies fully in the present case, however, since the main clause continues and concludes in l. 4, and is neither enclosed by the subordinate clause nor followed by the conj. ef introducing it. In dispensing by emendation with þat, which he takes as the nom. subject of tregar in Finnur Jónsson’s reading (in Skj B; it is also how Olsen reads it, Ragn 1906-08, 208, cf. 203, here following Finnur Jónsson in Hb 1892-6), Kock sees trega here as a subjectless, impersonal verb, and allies it with Nygaard’s list of such verbs (NS §88 Anm. 4). Þat, which is formally the same in the nom. and the acc., may indeed be the nom. subject of tregar, as Finnur and Olsen seem to assume; on the other hand, the verb tregar may equally well be impersonal, as Kock suggests, though with þat as well as þik in the acc. case, and þik functioning as ‘logical subject’ (cf. Stefán Einarsson 1945, 169-70).

skal ‘will’

(not checked:)
skulu (verb): shall, should, must

notes

[1, 2, 4] leiðangr skal verða búinn …, ef þat tregar þik ‘an expedition will be prepared …, if that is what is causing you grief’: The present reading ef þat tregar þik follows Hb 1892-6, Skj B, and Ragn 1906-8, 208 (cf. also Ragn 1944 and 2003), as far as assumed prose order and essential meaning are concerned. Kock (NN §§2369, 2811) objects to this reading on the twofold grounds that it is unacceptable for a subordinate clause to enclose a main clause, and for the conj. introducing the subordinate clause (here ef) to follow the main clause. He emends þat to þá, taking þá ‘then’ as introducing the main clause correlatively with ef (‘if you are worried, then an expedition … will be prepared’). Neither of his objections applies fully in the present case, however, since the main clause continues and concludes in l. 4, and is neither enclosed by the subordinate clause nor followed by the conj. ef introducing it. In dispensing by emendation with þat, which he takes as the nom. subject of tregar in Finnur Jónsson’s reading (in Skj B; it is also how Olsen reads it, Ragn 1906-08, 208, cf. 203, here following Finnur Jónsson in Hb 1892-6), Kock sees trega here as a subjectless, impersonal verb, and allies it with Nygaard’s list of such verbs (NS §88 Anm. 4). Þat, which is formally the same in the nom. and the acc., may indeed be the nom. subject of tregar, as Finnur and Olsen seem to assume; on the other hand, the verb tregar may equally well be impersonal, as Kock suggests, though with þat as well as þik in the acc. case, and þik functioning as ‘logical subject’ (cf. Stefán Einarsson 1945, 169-70). — [5]: The word order of 147 and Hb, adopted by all eds apart from Rafn (FSN) and Valdimar Ásmundarson (Ragn 1891), is preferred here to that of 1824b as being metrically superior in allowing the vowel alliteration to fall on a fully stressed penultimate syllable in the line.

skal ‘will’

(not checked:)
skulu (verb): shall, should, must

notes

[1, 2, 4] leiðangr skal verða búinn …, ef þat tregar þik ‘an expedition will be prepared …, if that is what is causing you grief’: The present reading ef þat tregar þik follows Hb 1892-6, Skj B, and Ragn 1906-8, 208 (cf. also Ragn 1944 and 2003), as far as assumed prose order and essential meaning are concerned. Kock (NN §§2369, 2811) objects to this reading on the twofold grounds that it is unacceptable for a subordinate clause to enclose a main clause, and for the conj. introducing the subordinate clause (here ef) to follow the main clause. He emends þat to þá, taking þá ‘then’ as introducing the main clause correlatively with ef (‘if you are worried, then an expedition … will be prepared’). Neither of his objections applies fully in the present case, however, since the main clause continues and concludes in l. 4, and is neither enclosed by the subordinate clause nor followed by the conj. ef introducing it. In dispensing by emendation with þat, which he takes as the nom. subject of tregar in Finnur Jónsson’s reading (in Skj B; it is also how Olsen reads it, Ragn 1906-08, 208, cf. 203, here following Finnur Jónsson in Hb 1892-6), Kock sees trega here as a subjectless, impersonal verb, and allies it with Nygaard’s list of such verbs (NS §88 Anm. 4). Þat, which is formally the same in the nom. and the acc., may indeed be the nom. subject of tregar, as Finnur and Olsen seem to assume; on the other hand, the verb tregar may equally well be impersonal, as Kock suggests, though with þat as well as þik in the acc. case, and þik functioning as ‘logical subject’ (cf. Stefán Einarsson 1945, 169-70). — [5]: The word order of 147 and Hb, adopted by all eds apart from Rafn (FSN) and Valdimar Ásmundarson (Ragn 1891), is preferred here to that of 1824b as being metrically superior in allowing the vowel alliteration to fall on a fully stressed penultimate syllable in the line.

þriggja ‘within three’

(not checked:)
þrír (num. cardinal): three

notes

[1] þriggja nátta ‘within three nights’: Gen. of time (cf. NS §140). If the speaker’s aim in this stanza is to reassure Áslaug that a revenge mission to Sweden is imminent, this, the reading of 1824b, adopted in all the eds used here apart from Hb 1892-6, is obviously more to the purpose than the vikna ‘weeks’ of 147 and Hb.

nátta ‘nights’

(not checked:)
nátt (noun f.; °náttar/nǽtr, dat. -/-u; nǽtr): night

[1] nátta: vikna 147, Hb

notes

[1] þriggja nátta ‘within three nights’: Gen. of time (cf. NS §140). If the speaker’s aim in this stanza is to reassure Áslaug that a revenge mission to Sweden is imminent, this, the reading of 1824b, adopted in all the eds used here apart from Hb 1892-6, is obviously more to the purpose than the vikna ‘weeks’ of 147 and Hb.

ef ‘if’

(not checked:)
3. ef (conj.): if

notes

[1, 2, 4] leiðangr skal verða búinn …, ef þat tregar þik ‘an expedition will be prepared …, if that is what is causing you grief’: The present reading ef þat tregar þik follows Hb 1892-6, Skj B, and Ragn 1906-8, 208 (cf. also Ragn 1944 and 2003), as far as assumed prose order and essential meaning are concerned. Kock (NN §§2369, 2811) objects to this reading on the twofold grounds that it is unacceptable for a subordinate clause to enclose a main clause, and for the conj. introducing the subordinate clause (here ef) to follow the main clause. He emends þat to þá, taking þá ‘then’ as introducing the main clause correlatively with ef (‘if you are worried, then an expedition … will be prepared’). Neither of his objections applies fully in the present case, however, since the main clause continues and concludes in l. 4, and is neither enclosed by the subordinate clause nor followed by the conj. ef introducing it. In dispensing by emendation with þat, which he takes as the nom. subject of tregar in Finnur Jónsson’s reading (in Skj B; it is also how Olsen reads it, Ragn 1906-08, 208, cf. 203, here following Finnur Jónsson in Hb 1892-6), Kock sees trega here as a subjectless, impersonal verb, and allies it with Nygaard’s list of such verbs (NS §88 Anm. 4). Þat, which is formally the same in the nom. and the acc., may indeed be the nom. subject of tregar, as Finnur and Olsen seem to assume; on the other hand, the verb tregar may equally well be impersonal, as Kock suggests, though with þat as well as þik in the acc. case, and þik functioning as ‘logical subject’ (cf. Stefán Einarsson 1945, 169-70).

þik ‘is causing you’

(not checked:)
þú (pron.; °gen. þín, dat. þér, acc. þik): you

notes

[1, 2, 4] leiðangr skal verða búinn …, ef þat tregar þik ‘an expedition will be prepared …, if that is what is causing you grief’: The present reading ef þat tregar þik follows Hb 1892-6, Skj B, and Ragn 1906-8, 208 (cf. also Ragn 1944 and 2003), as far as assumed prose order and essential meaning are concerned. Kock (NN §§2369, 2811) objects to this reading on the twofold grounds that it is unacceptable for a subordinate clause to enclose a main clause, and for the conj. introducing the subordinate clause (here ef) to follow the main clause. He emends þat to þá, taking þá ‘then’ as introducing the main clause correlatively with ef (‘if you are worried, then an expedition … will be prepared’). Neither of his objections applies fully in the present case, however, since the main clause continues and concludes in l. 4, and is neither enclosed by the subordinate clause nor followed by the conj. ef introducing it. In dispensing by emendation with þat, which he takes as the nom. subject of tregar in Finnur Jónsson’s reading (in Skj B; it is also how Olsen reads it, Ragn 1906-08, 208, cf. 203, here following Finnur Jónsson in Hb 1892-6), Kock sees trega here as a subjectless, impersonal verb, and allies it with Nygaard’s list of such verbs (NS §88 Anm. 4). Þat, which is formally the same in the nom. and the acc., may indeed be the nom. subject of tregar, as Finnur and Olsen seem to assume; on the other hand, the verb tregar may equally well be impersonal, as Kock suggests, though with þat as well as þik in the acc. case, and þik functioning as ‘logical subject’ (cf. Stefán Einarsson 1945, 169-70).

tregar ‘grief’

(not checked:)
1. trega (verb): distress

notes

[1, 2, 4] leiðangr skal verða búinn …, ef þat tregar þik ‘an expedition will be prepared …, if that is what is causing you grief’: The present reading ef þat tregar þik follows Hb 1892-6, Skj B, and Ragn 1906-8, 208 (cf. also Ragn 1944 and 2003), as far as assumed prose order and essential meaning are concerned. Kock (NN §§2369, 2811) objects to this reading on the twofold grounds that it is unacceptable for a subordinate clause to enclose a main clause, and for the conj. introducing the subordinate clause (here ef) to follow the main clause. He emends þat to þá, taking þá ‘then’ as introducing the main clause correlatively with ef (‘if you are worried, then an expedition … will be prepared’). Neither of his objections applies fully in the present case, however, since the main clause continues and concludes in l. 4, and is neither enclosed by the subordinate clause nor followed by the conj. ef introducing it. In dispensing by emendation with þat, which he takes as the nom. subject of tregar in Finnur Jónsson’s reading (in Skj B; it is also how Olsen reads it, Ragn 1906-08, 208, cf. 203, here following Finnur Jónsson in Hb 1892-6), Kock sees trega here as a subjectless, impersonal verb, and allies it with Nygaard’s list of such verbs (NS §88 Anm. 4). Þat, which is formally the same in the nom. and the acc., may indeed be the nom. subject of tregar, as Finnur and Olsen seem to assume; on the other hand, the verb tregar may equally well be impersonal, as Kock suggests, though with þat as well as þik in the acc. case, and þik functioning as ‘logical subject’ (cf. Stefán Einarsson 1945, 169-70).

móðir ‘mother’

(not checked:)
móðir (noun f.): mother

leið ‘way to go’

(not checked:)
leið (noun f.; °-ar, dat. -u/-; -ir/-ar): path, way

[3] leið eigu vér langa: so Hb, leið eigum vér langa 1824b, ‘(l)eid e(i)gu […]ga’(?) 147

eigu ‘have’

(not checked:)
2. eiga (verb; °á/eigr (præs. pl. 3. pers. eigu/eiga); átti, áttu; átt): own, have

[3] leið eigu vér langa: so Hb, leið eigum vér langa 1824b, ‘(l)eid e(i)gu […]ga’(?) 147

vér ‘we’

(not checked:)
vér (pron.; °gen. vár, dat./acc. oss): we, us, our

[3] leið eigu vér langa: so Hb, leið eigum vér langa 1824b, ‘(l)eid e(i)gu […]ga’(?) 147

langa ‘a long’

(not checked:)
langr (adj.; °compar. lengri, superl. lengstr): long

[3] leið eigu vér langa: so Hb, leið eigum vér langa 1824b, ‘(l)eid e(i)gu […]ga’(?) 147

leiðangr ‘An expedition’

(not checked:)
leiðangr (noun m.; °leiðangrs, dat. leiðangri; leiðangrar): naval levy

notes

[1, 2, 4] leiðangr skal verða búinn …, ef þat tregar þik ‘an expedition will be prepared …, if that is what is causing you grief’: The present reading ef þat tregar þik follows Hb 1892-6, Skj B, and Ragn 1906-8, 208 (cf. also Ragn 1944 and 2003), as far as assumed prose order and essential meaning are concerned. Kock (NN §§2369, 2811) objects to this reading on the twofold grounds that it is unacceptable for a subordinate clause to enclose a main clause, and for the conj. introducing the subordinate clause (here ef) to follow the main clause. He emends þat to þá, taking þá ‘then’ as introducing the main clause correlatively with ef (‘if you are worried, then an expedition … will be prepared’). Neither of his objections applies fully in the present case, however, since the main clause continues and concludes in l. 4, and is neither enclosed by the subordinate clause nor followed by the conj. ef introducing it. In dispensing by emendation with þat, which he takes as the nom. subject of tregar in Finnur Jónsson’s reading (in Skj B; it is also how Olsen reads it, Ragn 1906-08, 208, cf. 203, here following Finnur Jónsson in Hb 1892-6), Kock sees trega here as a subjectless, impersonal verb, and allies it with Nygaard’s list of such verbs (NS §88 Anm. 4). Þat, which is formally the same in the nom. and the acc., may indeed be the nom. subject of tregar, as Finnur and Olsen seem to assume; on the other hand, the verb tregar may equally well be impersonal, as Kock suggests, though with þat as well as þik in the acc. case, and þik functioning as ‘logical subject’ (cf. Stefán Einarsson 1945, 169-70).

búinn ‘prepared’

(not checked:)
2. búa (verb; °býr (1. pers. býg NjM 330²⁴); bjó/bjuggi/bjǫggi/byggi, bjuggu/bjǫggu (præt. conj. byggi); búinn (n. sg. búit/bút)): prepare, ready, live

[4] búinn: búin 147

notes

[1, 2, 4] leiðangr skal verða búinn …, ef þat tregar þik ‘an expedition will be prepared …, if that is what is causing you grief’: The present reading ef þat tregar þik follows Hb 1892-6, Skj B, and Ragn 1906-8, 208 (cf. also Ragn 1944 and 2003), as far as assumed prose order and essential meaning are concerned. Kock (NN §§2369, 2811) objects to this reading on the twofold grounds that it is unacceptable for a subordinate clause to enclose a main clause, and for the conj. introducing the subordinate clause (here ef) to follow the main clause. He emends þat to þá, taking þá ‘then’ as introducing the main clause correlatively with ef (‘if you are worried, then an expedition … will be prepared’). Neither of his objections applies fully in the present case, however, since the main clause continues and concludes in l. 4, and is neither enclosed by the subordinate clause nor followed by the conj. ef introducing it. In dispensing by emendation with þat, which he takes as the nom. subject of tregar in Finnur Jónsson’s reading (in Skj B; it is also how Olsen reads it, Ragn 1906-08, 208, cf. 203, here following Finnur Jónsson in Hb 1892-6), Kock sees trega here as a subjectless, impersonal verb, and allies it with Nygaard’s list of such verbs (NS §88 Anm. 4). Þat, which is formally the same in the nom. and the acc., may indeed be the nom. subject of tregar, as Finnur and Olsen seem to assume; on the other hand, the verb tregar may equally well be impersonal, as Kock suggests, though with þat as well as þik in the acc. case, and þik functioning as ‘logical subject’ (cf. Stefán Einarsson 1945, 169-70).

verða ‘be’

(not checked:)
1. verða (verb): become, be

notes

[1, 2, 4] leiðangr skal verða búinn …, ef þat tregar þik ‘an expedition will be prepared …, if that is what is causing you grief’: The present reading ef þat tregar þik follows Hb 1892-6, Skj B, and Ragn 1906-8, 208 (cf. also Ragn 1944 and 2003), as far as assumed prose order and essential meaning are concerned. Kock (NN §§2369, 2811) objects to this reading on the twofold grounds that it is unacceptable for a subordinate clause to enclose a main clause, and for the conj. introducing the subordinate clause (here ef) to follow the main clause. He emends þat to þá, taking þá ‘then’ as introducing the main clause correlatively with ef (‘if you are worried, then an expedition … will be prepared’). Neither of his objections applies fully in the present case, however, since the main clause continues and concludes in l. 4, and is neither enclosed by the subordinate clause nor followed by the conj. ef introducing it. In dispensing by emendation with þat, which he takes as the nom. subject of tregar in Finnur Jónsson’s reading (in Skj B; it is also how Olsen reads it, Ragn 1906-08, 208, cf. 203, here following Finnur Jónsson in Hb 1892-6), Kock sees trega here as a subjectless, impersonal verb, and allies it with Nygaard’s list of such verbs (NS §88 Anm. 4). Þat, which is formally the same in the nom. and the acc., may indeed be the nom. subject of tregar, as Finnur and Olsen seem to assume; on the other hand, the verb tregar may equally well be impersonal, as Kock suggests, though with þat as well as þik in the acc. case, and þik functioning as ‘logical subject’ (cf. Stefán Einarsson 1945, 169-70).

Skal ‘will’

(not checked:)
skulu (verb): shall, should, must

[5] Skal Uppsölum eigi: so 147, Hb, skal eigi Uppsölum 1824b

Uppsölum ‘Uppsala’

(not checked:)
Uppsalir (noun m.): [Uppsala]

[5] Skal Uppsölum eigi: so 147, Hb, skal eigi Uppsölum 1824b

notes

[5]: The word order of 147 and Hb, adopted by all eds apart from Rafn (FSN) and Valdimar Ásmundarson (Ragn 1891), is preferred here to that of 1824b as being metrically superior in allowing the vowel alliteration to fall on a fully stressed penultimate syllable in the line.

eigi ‘not’

(not checked:)
3. eigi (adv.): not

[5] Skal Uppsölum eigi: so 147, Hb, skal eigi Uppsölum 1824b

notes

[5]: The word order of 147 and Hb, adopted by all eds apart from Rafn (FSN) and Valdimar Ásmundarson (Ragn 1891), is preferred here to that of 1824b as being metrically superior in allowing the vowel alliteration to fall on a fully stressed penultimate syllable in the line.

þó ‘though’

(not checked:)
þó (adv.): though

[6] þó at ófafé bjóði: ‘þo at of fe bioðít’ 1824b, ‘þo[…]t ofur (fe) (biodi)’(?) 147, ‘þo at ofr fe bioði’ Hb

notes

[6] þó at bjóði ófafé ‘though he may offer excessive payment’: The reading here follows that of all previous eds (who variously have þó at and þótt) apart from Rafn (FSN) and Valdimar Ásmundarson (Ragn 1891), who have respectively þóat of fé bjóðið and þó at ofa fé bjóðið, of which the first at least is questionable metrically and which both mean, presumably, ‘though you (pl.) may offer excessive payment’, which hardly makes sense in the context.

at ‘he may’

(not checked:)
4. at (conj.): that

[6] þó at ófafé bjóði: ‘þo at of fe bioðít’ 1824b, ‘þo[…]t ofur (fe) (biodi)’(?) 147, ‘þo at ofr fe bioði’ Hb

notes

[6] þó at bjóði ófafé ‘though he may offer excessive payment’: The reading here follows that of all previous eds (who variously have þó at and þótt) apart from Rafn (FSN) and Valdimar Ásmundarson (Ragn 1891), who have respectively þóat of fé bjóðið and þó at ofa fé bjóðið, of which the first at least is questionable metrically and which both mean, presumably, ‘though you (pl.) may offer excessive payment’, which hardly makes sense in the context.

ófafé ‘excessive payment’

(not checked:)
ófafé (noun n.)

[6] þó at ófafé bjóði: ‘þo at of fe bioðít’ 1824b, ‘þo[…]t ofur (fe) (biodi)’(?) 147, ‘þo at ofr fe bioði’ Hb

notes

[6] þó at bjóði ófafé ‘though he may offer excessive payment’: The reading here follows that of all previous eds (who variously have þó at and þótt) apart from Rafn (FSN) and Valdimar Ásmundarson (Ragn 1891), who have respectively þóat of fé bjóðið and þó at ofa fé bjóðið, of which the first at least is questionable metrically and which both mean, presumably, ‘though you (pl.) may offer excessive payment’, which hardly makes sense in the context.

bjóði ‘offer’

(not checked:)
bjóða (verb; °býðr; bauð, buðu; boðinn (buð- Thom¹ 5²n.)): offer, order, invite

[6] þó at ófafé bjóði: ‘þo at of fe bioðít’ 1824b, ‘þo[…]t ofur (fe) (biodi)’(?) 147, ‘þo at ofr fe bioði’ Hb

notes

[6] þó at bjóði ófafé ‘though he may offer excessive payment’: The reading here follows that of all previous eds (who variously have þó at and þótt) apart from Rafn (FSN) and Valdimar Ásmundarson (Ragn 1891), who have respectively þóat of fé bjóðið and þó at ofa fé bjóðið, of which the first at least is questionable metrically and which both mean, presumably, ‘though you (pl.) may offer excessive payment’, which hardly makes sense in the context.

ef ‘if’

(not checked:)
3. ef (conj.): if

[7] ef oss duga eggjar: so Hb, ef svá duga dísir 1824b, ‘(ef […]ss du)ga eggiar’(?) 147

notes

[7] ef eggjar duga oss ‘if sword-blades serve us well’: The reading of Hb and 147, which is to be preferred over that of 1824b, ef svá duga dísir ‘if the dísir will lend support thus’, because it provides vocalic alliteration with the first syllable of Eysteinn, the head-stave in l. 8. There is no alliteration linking ll. 7-8 of 1824b. Most other eds adopt the Hb reading, with the exception of FSN, CPB (both with 1824b’s text), Ragn 1891 and Ragn 1985, the last two of whom read ef svá duga eggjar ‘if sword-blades avail’.

oss ‘us’

(not checked:)
vér (pron.; °gen. vár, dat./acc. oss): we, us, our

[7] ef oss duga eggjar: so Hb, ef svá duga dísir 1824b, ‘(ef […]ss du)ga eggiar’(?) 147

notes

[7] ef eggjar duga oss ‘if sword-blades serve us well’: The reading of Hb and 147, which is to be preferred over that of 1824b, ef svá duga dísir ‘if the dísir will lend support thus’, because it provides vocalic alliteration with the first syllable of Eysteinn, the head-stave in l. 8. There is no alliteration linking ll. 7-8 of 1824b. Most other eds adopt the Hb reading, with the exception of FSN, CPB (both with 1824b’s text), Ragn 1891 and Ragn 1985, the last two of whom read ef svá duga eggjar ‘if sword-blades avail’.

duga ‘serve’

(not checked:)
duga (verb; °dugir; dugði; dugat): help, befit

[7] ef oss duga eggjar: so Hb, ef svá duga dísir 1824b, ‘(ef […]ss du)ga eggiar’(?) 147

notes

[7] ef eggjar duga oss ‘if sword-blades serve us well’: The reading of Hb and 147, which is to be preferred over that of 1824b, ef svá duga dísir ‘if the dísir will lend support thus’, because it provides vocalic alliteration with the first syllable of Eysteinn, the head-stave in l. 8. There is no alliteration linking ll. 7-8 of 1824b. Most other eds adopt the Hb reading, with the exception of FSN, CPB (both with 1824b’s text), Ragn 1891 and Ragn 1985, the last two of whom read ef svá duga eggjar ‘if sword-blades avail’.

eggjar ‘sword-blades’

(not checked:)
1. egg (noun f.; °-jar, dat. -ju/-): edge, blade

[7] ef oss duga eggjar: so Hb, ef svá duga dísir 1824b, ‘(ef […]ss du)ga eggiar’(?) 147

notes

[7] ef eggjar duga oss ‘if sword-blades serve us well’: The reading of Hb and 147, which is to be preferred over that of 1824b, ef svá duga dísir ‘if the dísir will lend support thus’, because it provides vocalic alliteration with the first syllable of Eysteinn, the head-stave in l. 8. There is no alliteration linking ll. 7-8 of 1824b. Most other eds adopt the Hb reading, with the exception of FSN, CPB (both with 1824b’s text), Ragn 1891 and Ragn 1985, the last two of whom read ef svá duga eggjar ‘if sword-blades avail’.

Eysteinn ‘Eysteinn’

(not checked:)
Eysteinn (noun m.): Eysteinn

[8] Eysteinn konungr ráða: ‘eystein (beli) rada’(?) 147, Eysteinn beli ráða Hb

notes

[8] Eysteinn konungr ‘King Eysteinn’: In RagnSon and the X version of Ragn, preserved in Hb and 147 respectively, Eysteinn is given the byname beli, which appears in the 147 and Hb readings of this line. (The byname does not appear in the Y version of Ragn, preserved in 1824b, however.) Its origin and meaning are uncertain. It may be related to the giant name Beli which is in turn related to the verb belja ‘bellow’, or possibly to the noun belgr, meaning ‘animal-skin’ or ‘skin bag’ (Lidén 1928, 361-4; McTurk 1991a, 114-17). All previous eds apart from those of CPB (who have Eysteinn Beli) and Finnur Jónsson in Hb 1892-6 (as opposed to Skj B) adopt the 1824b reading here. Eysteinn beli is listed in Skáldatal (SnE 1848-87 III, 251-2, 259-60, 270-1), along with Ragnarr loðbrók and Bjǫrn at Haugi, as a patron of the C9th poet Bragi Boddason, to whom the poem Ragnarsdrápa (Bragi Rdr^III) is attributed. Given Snorri Sturluson’s association of this poem with Ragnarr loðbrók (SnE 1998 I, 72-3), and Bragi’s sobriquet inn gamli ‘the Old’, applied to him by Snorri and in Skáldatal (see McTurk 2003, 112-13), and indicating that in C13th Iceland Bragi was regarded as a figure of the distant past, it is of some interest to find the nickname beli applied to Eysteinn in Hb (early C14th) and in 147 (c. 1450) in connection with Ragnarr loðbrók, raising the question of whether this Eysteinn’s connection with Bragi as well as with Ragnarr was common knowledge in late medieval Iceland.

konungr ‘King’

(not checked:)
konungr (noun m.; °dat. -i, -s; -ar): king

[8] Eysteinn konungr ráða: ‘eystein (beli) rada’(?) 147, Eysteinn beli ráða Hb

notes

[8] Eysteinn konungr ‘King Eysteinn’: In RagnSon and the X version of Ragn, preserved in Hb and 147 respectively, Eysteinn is given the byname beli, which appears in the 147 and Hb readings of this line. (The byname does not appear in the Y version of Ragn, preserved in 1824b, however.) Its origin and meaning are uncertain. It may be related to the giant name Beli which is in turn related to the verb belja ‘bellow’, or possibly to the noun belgr, meaning ‘animal-skin’ or ‘skin bag’ (Lidén 1928, 361-4; McTurk 1991a, 114-17). All previous eds apart from those of CPB (who have Eysteinn Beli) and Finnur Jónsson in Hb 1892-6 (as opposed to Skj B) adopt the 1824b reading here. Eysteinn beli is listed in Skáldatal (SnE 1848-87 III, 251-2, 259-60, 270-1), along with Ragnarr loðbrók and Bjǫrn at Haugi, as a patron of the C9th poet Bragi Boddason, to whom the poem Ragnarsdrápa (Bragi Rdr^III) is attributed. Given Snorri Sturluson’s association of this poem with Ragnarr loðbrók (SnE 1998 I, 72-3), and Bragi’s sobriquet inn gamli ‘the Old’, applied to him by Snorri and in Skáldatal (see McTurk 2003, 112-13), and indicating that in C13th Iceland Bragi was regarded as a figure of the distant past, it is of some interest to find the nickname beli applied to Eysteinn in Hb (early C14th) and in 147 (c. 1450) in connection with Ragnarr loðbrók, raising the question of whether this Eysteinn’s connection with Bragi as well as with Ragnarr was common knowledge in late medieval Iceland.

ráða ‘rule’

(not checked:)
ráða (verb): advise, rule, interpret, decide

[8] Eysteinn konungr ráða: ‘eystein (beli) rada’(?) 147, Eysteinn beli ráða Hb