Kari Ellen Gade (ed.) 2017, ‘Þórðr Særeksson (Sjáreksson), Fragments 2’ in Kari Ellen Gade and Edith Marold (eds), Poetry from Treatises on Poetics. Skaldic Poetry of the Scandinavian Middle Ages 3. Turnhout: Brepols, p. 477.
(not checked:)
2. Hlǫkk (noun f.): Hlǫkk
[1] stofns Hlakkar ‘the tree-stump of Hlǫkk <valkyrie> [WARRIOR]’: The base-word, stofns ‘the tree-stump’, is in the gen. and it is likely that the kenning is the object of the verb hefna ‘avenge’, which is construed with a gen. object.
(not checked:)
stofn (noun m.; °-s, dat. -i; -ar): pole, tree-stump
[1] stofns Hlakkar ‘the tree-stump of Hlǫkk <valkyrie> [WARRIOR]’: The base-word, stofns ‘the tree-stump’, is in the gen. and it is likely that the kenning is the object of the verb hefna ‘avenge’, which is construed with a gen. object.
(not checked:)
5. at (nota): to (with infinitive)
(not checked:)
hefna (verb): avenge
(not checked:)
1. herðandi (noun m.): strengthener
[2] herðendr sverða ‘the strengtheners of swords [WARRIORS]’: The base-word (herðendr ‘strengtheners, hardeners’) is in the nom. (or acc.). Kock suggested that it could function either as a form of address (NN §1124B) or as the subject of hefna ‘avenge’. Following the latter interpretation, he regarded at (l. 1) as the conj. ‘that’ rather than as the inf. marker ‘to’ (NN §2018): at herðendr sverða hefna stofns Hlakkar ‘that the strengtheners of swords avenge the tree-stump of Hlǫkk’. The couplet must originally have been preceded by two lines, and Kock’s suggestions are conjectural. In the present edn, at is taken as the inf. marker ‘to’.
(not checked:)
í (prep.): in, into
[2] í því ‘in that’: Again it is unclear what this prepositional phrase refers to, and it could also mean ‘thereby’ or ‘at that’.
[2] í því ‘in that’: Again it is unclear what this prepositional phrase refers to, and it could also mean ‘thereby’ or ‘at that’.
(not checked:)
sverð (noun n.; °-s; -): sword
[2] herðendr sverða ‘the strengtheners of swords [WARRIORS]’: The base-word (herðendr ‘strengtheners, hardeners’) is in the nom. (or acc.). Kock suggested that it could function either as a form of address (NN §1124B) or as the subject of hefna ‘avenge’. Following the latter interpretation, he regarded at (l. 1) as the conj. ‘that’ rather than as the inf. marker ‘to’ (NN §2018): at herðendr sverða hefna stofns Hlakkar ‘that the strengtheners of swords avenge the tree-stump of Hlǫkk’. The couplet must originally have been preceded by two lines, and Kock’s suggestions are conjectural. In the present edn, at is taken as the inf. marker ‘to’.
Interactive view: tap on words in the text for notes and glosses
The couplet illustrates base-words of the category ‘tree’ in man-kennings.
The couplet is syntactically incomplete and too fragmentary to allow for a meaningful translation.
Use the buttons at the top of the page to navigate between stanzas in a poem.
The text and translation are given here, with buttons to toggle whether the text is shown in the verse order or prose word order. Clicking on indiviudal words gives dictionary links, variant readings, kennings and notes, where relevant.
This is the text of the edition in a similar format to how the edition appears in the printed volumes.
This view is also used for chapters and other text segments. Not all the headings shown are relevant to such sections.